The Electoral Votes of 1876 / Who Should Count Them, What Should Be Counted, and the Remedy for a Wrong Count

Name: The Electoral Votes of 1876 / Who Should Count Them, What Should Be Counted, and the Remedy for a Wrong Count
Author: David Dudley Field

By David Dudley Field

Open in WeRead

Explore more books like this:

History - American Law & Criminology Politics

About This Book

The author analyzes constitutional procedures and ambiguities surrounding the counting of presidential electors, distinguishing mere enumeration from the assessment of validity; he contends that the language and longstanding practice point to a joint role for the two Houses, rather than sole action by the presiding officer, in determining which votes are legitimate. The essay reviews precedents and resolutions, outlines remedies for a wrongful count, and stresses the civic and legal imperative to secure a lawful, transparent tally to prevent fraud and maintain public confidence in the electoral process.

About the Author

David Dudley Field

David Dudley Field was an American author and legal reformer, known for his influential writings on electoral processes and the legal system. His notable works include "The Electoral Votes of 1876 / Who Should Count Them, What Should Be Counted, and the Remedy for a Wrong Count," which addresses the complexities of electoral vote counting in the aftermath of a contentious presidential election. Field's contributions to literature reflect his deep engagement with the political and legal issues of his time, particularly the integrity of democratic processes. His writings continue to resonate in discussions about electoral reform and governance.